9 posts encontrados
Prompt injection isn't a bug — it's a fundamental property of current LLM architecture. The Countermind paper proposes 4-layer defense. OWASP's Top 10 for LLMs lists prompt injection as vulnerability #1. And your 'hardened' system prompt won't save you.
FloTorch's February 2026 benchmark shocked the community: recursive 512-token chunking BEAT semantic. 80% of RAG failures trace to ingestion, not the LLM. And the 'simple' strategy is often the best. Here's the guide I wish I'd read sooner.
+8.3% accuracy. Up to 2.4x faster. 75.6% fewer tokens. Training cost: $4.27. RecursiveMAS proves that when AIs stop 'talking' and start 'thinking together,' everything changes.
Chroma tested 18 frontier models: ALL degrade with long context. Effective context can drop up to 99% below advertised. But prompt caching saves 41-80%. This is the guide I wish I'd read before burning $2,000 in tokens.
60% of production projects use both. The combined approach hits 96% accuracy vs 89% RAG-only and 91% fine-tuning-only. Salesforce's AI VP cut hallucinations from 12% to 3%. But where do you start?
85% per-step accuracy sounds good. But in a 10-step workflow, that's 20% success. Gartner predicts 40%+ of agentic AI projects will be scrapped by 2027. The fix isn't a better model — it's engineering I wish I'd learned sooner.
512,000 lines of code leaked. 1,906 files. And the revelation that shocked the community: the AI itself is a while loop with one core function. The other 98% is traditional software engineering. Brilliant.
Stanford proved that changing only the harness — without touching the model — creates up to 6x performance swings. Meta-Harness ranked #1 on TerminalBench-2, beating all human solutions. The problem was never the model.
In 2024, AI hallucinations cost $67.4 billion globally. A lawyer was sanctioned for citing cases invented by ChatGPT. A 2025 mathematical proof confirmed: hallucinations CANNOT be eliminated. Why?